When choosing a career, young people often face the dilemma of whether to follow their passions or to choose a more pragmatic path that considers future stability. Some argue that young people should be free to pursue jobs they are passionate about, while others contend that they should take a more realistic approach and think more about long-term prospects. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide an opinion on the matter.
On one hand, there is a strong argument that young people should choose the jobs they genuinely desire. This approach allows them to pursue their interests and passions, which can lead to greater job satisfaction and personal fulfillment. Working in a field that one loves can also drive creativity and innovation, as individuals are more likely to be engaged and motivated. For instance, many successful entrepreneurs and artists have achieved remarkable success precisely because they followed their passion rather than conforming to societal expectations. Additionally, being passionate about one’s job can increase resilience during challenging times, as the individual is more likely to find intrinsic motivation to overcome obstacles.
On the other hand, some people argue that young people should be more realistic when choosing their careers. This view is based on the idea that not all passions lead to financially stable or secure jobs, especially in a rapidly changing job market. Practical considerations, such as job availability, salary, and career growth opportunities, are crucial for long-term stability and financial independence. For example, pursuing a career in a niche field with limited demand could lead to unemployment or underemployment, which can be stressful and unsustainable. Moreover, choosing a realistic career path can offer more structured progression and skill development, which are valuable for building a secure future.
In my opinion, a balanced approach is best. Young people should aim to find a career that aligns with their interests and passions while also considering practical factors such as job security and growth potential. It is essential to recognize that passion and pragmatism are not mutually exclusive. For example, someone interested in writing could pursue a career in digital marketing or content creation, where their skills and interests are both relevant and in demand. By combining passion with practical considerations, young people can enjoy a fulfilling career that also offers long-term stability.
In conclusion, while it is important for young people to pursue jobs that they are passionate about, they should also consider practical aspects to ensure a secure future. A balanced approach, where passion meets practicality, can lead to both personal fulfillment and professional success.
Reasons for an 8 Band Score
Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views and providing a clear opinion. It presents relevant examples and ideas to support both sides of the argument and makes a conclusion that logically follows from the arguments presented.
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-structured with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that logically flow, and a conclusion. Ideas are organized coherently, with appropriate use of linking words and phrases (e.g., "On one hand," "On the other hand," "For instance," "In conclusion") that enhance readability.
Lexical Resource: There is a wide range of vocabulary used appropriately and effectively. The essay demonstrates flexibility with less common lexical items (e.g., "intrinsic motivation," "underemployment," "structured progression") and provides precise word choices that enhance meaning.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay demonstrates a variety of complex sentence structures (e.g., conditional sentences, relative clauses) with good control. While it is mostly free of grammatical errors, a few minor mistakes may still be present, but they do not impede comprehension.
No comments:
Post a Comment